The miracle of science – but why can’t you cure my cold!
In this section we invite our reader to tell us about their work, lives and scientific passions. Here, Steve Trim ponders the widening gap between what science can do and what the public expects Is the mainstream media hype over new scientific discoveries and inventions widening the gap between what medicine can do and what the public expect? The public do have the access to a vast amount of knowledge thanks to the internet, but the majority seem to prefer their information pre-digested. As a pharmaceutical scientist come biotech entrepreneur I’m always intrigued about the public’s perception of what science and medicine can and importantly can’t do. How many of you have spoken to friends and family that have been frustrated about apparently not getting a complete diagnosis and/or cure from the medical staff they have consulted with. So many people visit the doctor with cough/ rash etc and come back with what they feel is a dismissive answer; it’s probably a virus. What many people don’t realise, is behind this diagnosis is years of experience and decades of research consisting of attempts to find ways of killing pathogens, such as viruses, that are technically not alive anyway. Those of us scientists familiar with the wonders of virology will either be fascinated, frustrated or possibly both, by the ability of many viruses to continue to evade medicinal control. But I think people who are not familiar with what goes on behind the scenes, feel disappointed, that their ills are not curable in a world where we have the bulk of human knowledge on tap on our pocket smart phones. The free speech nature of the internet brings many problems along with the solutions available from knowledge sharing, such as distinguishing fact from opinion! This is a problem many of my lecturer friends frequently rant about when marking students work. This has also lead to the arm chair experts who soak up the wealth of information available to them, often with little thought to the source or authenticity. This fuels the greying of the boundaries between what is and is not achievable along with truly demonstrating how a little knowledge can be dangerous. As the only primate species to have populated the entire globe we have achieved much through science to get us this far. The discovery of penicillin, which must have seemed miraculous to patients at the end of the Second World War, transformed infections like gangrene from a potential death sentence to being just a course of tablets away. Although Flemming discovered the antibacterial properties of Penicillium sp. in 1928 it wasn’t until 1945 that large scale fermentation allowed for bulk production of this pivotal antibiotic. I believe this could have started the myth of the miracles of modern medicine to cure every ill. The pace of modern medicine has revolutionised what conditions can be treated. This is exemplified by a paper in the Journal Brain in April (Angeli, et al in press) that described how spinal injury patients with neuromuscular lower limb paralysis were able to make voluntary movements of the ankle and knee joints with epidural spinal cord stimulation. The four patients were at least 2.2 years post paralysis and one was four years post injury. This has been seen, and rightly so, as a significant breakthrough in the treatment of spinal injury. But it’s the medical challenges that science is still trying to answer that are the real areas of fascination.
Flu virus